“Effort is visible in the action movement of a worker, or a dancer, and it is audible in song or speech,” Laban observes in Mastery of Movement. “The fact that effort and its various shadings can not only be seen and heard, but also imagined, is of great importance for their representation by the actor-dancer.”
Awakening the imagination is an important part of enriching one’s dynamic range. Laban draws a close link between imagination and playing. During play, he explains, the child experiments with all imaginable situations — offense, defence, ambush, ruse, flight, fear — searching for “the best possible effort combination for each occasion.” He adds, in children, “we call it play; in adult people we call it acting and dancing.”
Effort patterns become habits as one matures, Laban notes, and that is why young humans “have a much more varied scale of effort capacities at their disposal than their elders.” This statement reminds me of Isadora Duncan’s observation that most people resort to a set of habits, and “with these few stereotyped gestures, their whole lives are passed without once suspecting the world of dance which they are missing.”
Revitalize your own dynamic range and stimulate your movement imagination in the forthcoming Red Thread workshop, “Expanding the Dynamosphere,” July 22-23, in New York City.

In discussing the actor who is an artist, Laban writes “this kind of performer concentrates on the actuation of the inner springs of conduct preceding his movements, and pays little attention at first to the skill needed for presentation.” In other words, this actor focuses on the inner intention to move.
Lamb affirmed that “effort goes with shape organically.” Yet careful study of an individual’s movement pattern will reveal an emphasis on effort more than shape, or vice versa. Lamb came to feel that this difference was fundamental and significant.
Effort is not only about doing; it is also about being, or what Rudolf Laban calls movement thinking. “Movement thinking could be considered as a gathering of impressions of happenings in one’s own mind, for which nomenclature is lacking. This thinking does not serve orientation in the external world but rather it perfects man’s orientation in his inner world.”