Rudolf Laban’s use of movement-based observational techniques anticipated the notion of “embodied cognition” by several decades. In his writings in the 1940s and 50s, Laban already had identified “mental efforts” — namely those of giving attention to what must be done, forming an intention to act, and finally taking decisive action — as stages of “inner preparation for outer action.”
Laban went on to associate each of these mental efforts to one of the motion factors, according to the following scheme:
“The motion factor of Space can be associated with man’s faculty of participation with attention. The predominant tendency here is to orientate oneself and find a relationship to the matter of interest either in an immediate, direct way or in a circumspective, flexible one.”
“The motion factor of Weight can be associated with man’s faculty of participation with intention. The desire to do a certain thing may take hold of one sometimes powerfully and firmly, sometimes gently and slightly.”
“ The motion factor of Time can be associated with man’s faculty of participation with decision. Decisions can be made either unexpectedly and suddenly … or they may be developed gradually.”
Building on Laban’s correlations, Warren Lamb extended and refined the linking of movement factors with mental processes. Find out more in the next blog.

by Cate Deicher
Since 1991, Motus Humanus has been serving the Laban community by providing various services to support movement professionals as they develop their post-certification careers. These include the following.
In 1991, Charlotte Honda, Kaoru Yamamoto, and I formed
In 1975 Buckminster Fuller coined the term “tensegrity” by contacting two terms — tensional and integrity. Simply defined, tensegrity refers to “compression elements in a sea of tension.”